Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Disruption of the interferon-gamma axis limits chimeric antigen receptor T cell efficacy against acute myeloid leukemia
Murren, N.; King, I.; Mahoney, L.; Roy, J.; Kletzien, O. A.; Collins, M.; Geffe, S.; Kalcheim, L.; Richards, R.
Interferon-gamma signalling is required for CD123 target antigen upregulation on AML blasts, so blocking interferon-gamma to control CAR T toxicity also removes the antigen density that the therapy depends on.
Mild contradiction
1 prior failureOne documented clinical failure (Phase 1 or 2) overlaps with the claimed mechanism.
Abstract excerpt
Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for treatment of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), its translation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been hindered by limited efficacy and significant toxicity. Interferon-gamma (IFN{gamma}) blockade with emapalumab has recently emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate CAR T cell-related toxicities in B cell malignancies, based on evidence that IFN{gamma} is largely dispensable for optimal CAR T cell activity in B-ALL. Whether IFN{gamma} signaling is similarly non-essential in the AML context remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that disruption of the IFN{gamma} axis impedes anti-AML CAR T cell function and prevents upregulation of target antigen CD123, the apoptotic mediator Fas, and the adhesion molecule ICAM-1 on AML cells. Conversely, exogenous IFN{gamma} enhances CAR T cell cytotoxicity and increases CAR T cell avidity for AML targets. These findings identify IFN{gamma} as a critical mediator of CAR T cell efficacy against AML by promoting increased target antigen expression, enhanced cytotoxicity, and stable CAR T/tumor interactions. Our results suggest that therapeutic IFN{gamma} blockade, including with emapalumab, may compromise CAR T cell responses in AML and should be approached with caution in this disease context.
Matching Claidex post-mortems
1 of 1 indexedThis is an automated contradiction flag, not an editorial judgment on the preprint's quality. Flags identify where the preclinical literature and the clinical failure record diverge.

