Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
ERBB2 establishes the timing of progesterone priming required for uterine receptivity
Li, B.; Zhang, C.; Dewar, A.; Liu, X.; Deng, W.; Qi, H.; Dey, S. K.; Sun, X.
ERBB2 sets the timing of stromal progesterone responsiveness by controlling the threshold for progesterone receptor induction; uterine Erbb2 deletion in mice defers implantation and impairs decidualization, and ERBB2 is downregulated in endometrial stroma from women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Moderate contradiction
2 prior failuresTwo documented clinical failures match this mechanism, or a single Phase 3 failure is on record.
Abstract excerpt
Progesterone is essential for establishing uterine receptivity and sustaining early pregnancy. However, how the uterus acquires the competence to respond to progesterone at the appropriate time remains poorly understood. Here we show that ERBB2 governs the timing of progesterone responsiveness required for uterine receptivity. In endometrial samples from women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), ERBB2 is downregulated specifically in the stromal compartment, accompanied by a parallel reduction in stromal progesterone receptor (PGR). Uterine deletion of Erbb2 in mice blunts the rise of stromal PGR at the onset of the receptive window, deferring implantation and impairing decidualization despite normal circulating progesterone and estrogen. Epithelial deletion has no such effect, placing the requirement in the stroma. High-dose progesterone fails to rescue the phenotype; advancing progesterone priming by 24 hours restores stromal PGR, HAND2, Bmp2, and on-time implantation. Collectively, the present study provides evidence that ERBB2 directs the temporal window of stromal progesterone priming by setting the threshold for PGR induction, thereby synchronizing the maternal-fetal interface and safeguarding pregnancy.
Matching Claidex post-mortems
2 of 2 indexedThis is an automated contradiction flag, not an editorial judgment on the preprint's quality. Flags identify where the preclinical literature and the clinical failure record diverge.

