Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Identification and inhibition of the Cyclin D Rb-docking interface that drives cell division
Topacio, B. R.; Fleming, C.; Lanz, M.; Ord, M.; Memarpoor-Yazdi, M.; Zhang, S.; Xie, S.; Tuvikene, J.; Weaver, A.; Sanidas, I.; Davey, N.; Pryciak, P.; Sage, J.; Rubin, S.; Koivomagi, M.; Skotheim, J.
D-type cyclins dock the retinoblastoma protein through an A2 prime helix interface distinct from the p27-occupied hydrophobic patch, and mutating that interface slows proliferation, positioning the docking site as a target separate from the CDK4 and CDK6 ATP pocket.
Moderate contradiction
2 prior failuresTwo documented clinical failures match this mechanism, or a single Phase 3 failure is on record.
Abstract excerpt
The animal cell division cycle is initiated by the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 in complex with D-type cyclins. Cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex formation is promoted by the assembly factors p21 and p27, which bind both subunits. p27 binds the hydrophobic patch on cyclin D that is similar to the patch used by other cell cycle cyclins to dock their substrates. This raised the question as to how cyclin D could find its substrates if its hydrophobic patch were already occupied? Here, we show that D-type cyclins use their A2' helix to dock the retinoblastoma protein Rb, a key substrate regulating cell cycle progression. The specific interface of cyclin D's A2' helix is unique among cyclins and its mutation slows proliferation. Taken together, our work identifies a cyclin D-substrate docking mechanism that can be targeted by novel cancer therapeutics.
Matching Claidex post-mortems
2 of 2 indexed- May 25, 2026Abemaciclib in HPV-negative HNSCC AIM window trial halted after standard-of-care shift to neoadjuvant immunotherapyAbemaciclib (LY2835219, VERZENIO)SponsorMRS 28
- May 21, 2026Lerociclib in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a clean strategic shutdown in a saturated classLerociclib (G1T38)SponsorMRS 23
This is an automated contradiction flag, not an editorial judgment on the preprint's quality. Flags identify where the preclinical literature and the clinical failure record diverge.

